<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Governments Have a Veto at ICANN?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/01/do-governments-have-a-veto-at-icann/feed/langswitch_lang/en/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/01/do-governments-have-a-veto-at-icann/</link>
	<description>New gTLD Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/01/do-governments-have-a-veto-at-icann/#comment-2150</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=561#comment-2150</guid>
		<description>The U.S. Government, via the NTIA&#039;s IANA contract with ICANN, must approve any new TLD. Thus the U.S. Gov already has, and always maintained, veto power on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Government, via the NTIA&#8217;s IANA contract with ICANN, must approve any new TLD. Thus the U.S. Gov already has, and always maintained, veto power on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Lawley</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/01/do-governments-have-a-veto-at-icann/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Lawley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=561#comment-457</guid>
		<description>The question of ICANN following its own bylaws and the exact role of the GAC and their &quot;advice&quot; is at the center of the Independent Review process now awaiting a decision in the case of ICM Registry LLC vs. ICANN. This new gTLD process and the EOI and the never end delays is very reminiscent of the frustrations we suffered back in 2005-2007. The findings of the Panel should be delivered quite soon and perhaps their verdict will shed some light on a potential &quot;GAC Veto&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of ICANN following its own bylaws and the exact role of the GAC and their &#8220;advice&#8221; is at the center of the Independent Review process now awaiting a decision in the case of ICM Registry LLC vs. ICANN. This new gTLD process and the EOI and the never end delays is very reminiscent of the frustrations we suffered back in 2005-2007. The findings of the Panel should be delivered quite soon and perhaps their verdict will shed some light on a potential &#8220;GAC Veto&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Governments Deliver Another Blow to New Top Level Domain Timeline - IDN Forums - Internationalised Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/01/do-governments-have-a-veto-at-icann/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Governments Deliver Another Blow to New Top Level Domain Timeline - IDN Forums - Internationalised Domain Names</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=561#comment-456</guid>
		<description>[...] Governments Deliver Another Blow to New Top Level Domain Timeline      Interesting post:  http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010...veto-at-icann/  And at the ICANN Studienkreis last week in Barcelona, I asked a panel that included Fiona [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Governments Deliver Another Blow to New Top Level Domain Timeline      Interesting post:  <a href="http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010...veto-at-icann/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010&#8230;veto-at-icann/</a>  And at the ICANN Studienkreis last week in Barcelona, I asked a panel that included Fiona [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel sRoberts</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/01/do-governments-have-a-veto-at-icann/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel sRoberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=561#comment-454</guid>
		<description>The &#039;creative tension&#039; in the process is crucial to its success. But we must be careful not to bring about unintended negative consquences, such as the accidental restriction of free speech, just because that is alien to certain commercial interests or inimical to undemocratic systems of government</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;creative tension&#8217; in the process is crucial to its success. But we must be careful not to bring about unintended negative consquences, such as the accidental restriction of free speech, just because that is alien to certain commercial interests or inimical to undemocratic systems of government</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

