<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey Shows Brands Don&#8217;t Register Defensively in New gTLDs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/feed/langswitch_lang/en/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/</link>
	<description>New gTLD Experts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon busca registrar su propio dominio .canon &#124; Logit42</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon busca registrar su propio dominio .canon &#124; Logit42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 01:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>[...] tampoco gastarán millones de dólares para comprar sus propios dominios de alto nivel, de hecho un estudio mostró que de 1043 compañías importantes, sólo un pequeño porcentaje estaría interesado en [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tampoco gastarán millones de dólares para comprar sus propios dominios de alto nivel, de hecho un estudio mostró que de 1043 compañías importantes, sólo un pequeño porcentaje estaría interesado en [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should brand owners really ignore the threat of cybersquatters? &#124; Intellectual Property India</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>Should brand owners really ignore the threat of cybersquatters? &#124; Intellectual Property India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 10:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-607</guid>
		<description>[...] the interests of domainers and trademark professionals continues with the publication of a new study claiming that Fortune 100 companies have not registered many of their trademarks in recently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the interests of domainers and trademark professionals continues with the publication of a new study claiming that Fortune 100 companies have not registered many of their trademarks in recently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New gTLDs will cost $155 billion, honest &#124; DomainIncite.com - Domain Name News &#38; Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>New gTLDs will cost $155 billion, honest &#124; DomainIncite.com - Domain Name News &#38; Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-605</guid>
		<description>[...] + Machines released a study on this in February. I don&#8217;t really buy its numbers, but let&#8217;s use them [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] + Machines released a study on this in February. I don&#8217;t really buy its numbers, but let&#8217;s use them [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon aims to register the .canon domain. Will others follow suit? &#124; Tech Industry News</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon aims to register the .canon domain. Will others follow suit? &#124; Tech Industry News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-589</guid>
		<description>[...] your company name before a squatter gets it. It might not be accurate conventional wisdom, though. One study found that, out of 1043 major companies, only a small percentage even bothered to grab up the last round [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your company name before a squatter gets it. It might not be accurate conventional wisdom, though. One study found that, out of 1043 major companies, only a small percentage even bothered to grab up the last round [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Thin Brand Line&#8221; Breaks as Canon Announces Plans for .CANON &#124; Minds + Machines &#124; ICANN new TLDs</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Thin Brand Line&#8221; Breaks as Canon Announces Plans for .CANON &#124; Minds + Machines &#124; ICANN new TLDs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-584</guid>
		<description>[...] marched in lock step in opposition to new top-level domains, ostensibly because of the high cost of defending and enforcing their marks in multiple new namespaces. The worst-kept secret in the industry, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] marched in lock step in opposition to new top-level domains, ostensibly because of the high cost of defending and enforcing their marks in multiple new namespaces. The worst-kept secret in the industry, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael &#124; managedIP</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael &#124; managedIP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-560</guid>
		<description>A while ago we looked at German top 30 companies (listed on the German index DAX) whether their name was registered under .ASIA: Except two they were all registered (man.asia was an auction domain and the other company was not active in Asia at all). We also ran the same test on .CM domains, and found only 25% registered, of which 10% we grabbed.
Tells me two things:
- companies have a strategy on what to register and what not
- they are still victim to squatting
(but is ignored or just monitored)
Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago we looked at German top 30 companies (listed on the German index DAX) whether their name was registered under .ASIA: Except two they were all registered (man.asia was an auction domain and the other company was not active in Asia at all). We also ran the same test on .CM domains, and found only 25% registered, of which 10% we grabbed.<br />
Tells me two things:<br />
- companies have a strategy on what to register and what not<br />
- they are still victim to squatting<br />
(but is ignored or just monitored)<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defensive Registrierungen von Markeninhabern unter neuen TLDs</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Defensive Registrierungen von Markeninhabern unter neuen TLDs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-559</guid>
		<description>[...] Hier der Link zum Bericht. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hier der Link zum Bericht. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DENVERINTERNATIONALAIRPORTMOVIE.COM. Amazingly unsquatted. &#124; Search Engine Optimization Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>DENVERINTERNATIONALAIRPORTMOVIE.COM. Amazingly unsquatted. &#124; Search Engine Optimization Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 01:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-557</guid>
		<description>[...] Amazingly unsquatted. Wednesday, March 3, 2010  Posted by Dustin Busmann @ 5:15 pm   A recent study of corporate domain purchasing determined, based upon the empirical data collected, that across the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Amazingly unsquatted. Wednesday, March 3, 2010  Posted by Dustin Busmann @ 5:15 pm   A recent study of corporate domain purchasing determined, based upon the empirical data collected, that across the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Van Couvering</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Van Couvering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Dennis - You are correct -- mostly.  I would say that the issues arise and will arise in *relevant* successful TLDs. Nike will want to register in .shoes.  I would be skeptical if they insist they need to register in .realestate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis &#8211; You are correct &#8212; mostly.  I would say that the issues arise and will arise in *relevant* successful TLDs. Nike will want to register in .shoes.  I would be skeptical if they insist they need to register in .realestate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.mindsandmachines.com/2010/02/survey-shows-brands-dont-register-defensively-in-new-gtlds/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mindsandmachines.com/?p=571#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Antony,
Many thanks - Very illuminating.  So the issues arise and will arise with successful TLDs.
Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antony,<br />
Many thanks &#8211; Very illuminating.  So the issues arise and will arise with successful TLDs.<br />
Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

