Analysis of ICANN Comments on Expressions of Interest
The following is a quantitative analysis of the ICANN public comment for the New gTLD Program – Draft Expressions of Interest/Pre-Registrations Model. The full text of comments can be found on ICANN’s site.
We have also prepared a PDF version of our analysis, which includes a full list of all comments and a brief description of each comment.
I. Overall Findings
The ICANN public comment for the New gTLD Program – Draft Expressions of Interest/Pre-Registrations Model closed on February 7, 2010. A total of 274 separate comments were received (several commenters made multiple comments). 183 comments (67 percent) supported EOIs, and a majority of those favored the Draft Model. 76 comments (28 percent) were opposed to EOIs. 15 comments (5 percent) were neither for nor against the Draft Model.
II. EOI Supporters
EOI supporters break down into two major categories (number of comments in parentheses). A full list of commenters, with a brief description of their comments, can be found in the attached PDF.
- Companies and Groups in Favor of EOIs (86)
- Individuals (97)
Commenters in favor of EOIs can be further divided into the following categories:
- Prospective Applicants for new gTLDs
- Individuals connected to prospective applicants
- The ICANN At-Large Advisory Committee
- The ICANN ISP Constituency
- The ICANN GNSO
- Independent small and medium-sized businesses
- Independent individuals
- Independent not-for-profit membership organizations
- Independent not-for-profit charities
- Existing gTLD registries
- Existing ccTLD registries
- ICANN-accredited gTLD registrars
- Law firms
III. Arguments Made for EOIs
Comments of the respondents in favor of EOIs were for the most part in full agreement with the staff proposal. Some, however, had additional thoughts or reservations:
- Timetable – the delay in the introduction of gTLDs hurts legitimate applicants who relied on ICANN’s announced timetables.
- Begin the process – The gTLD process needs to get started, EOIs are a welcome first step.
- Predictability – EOIs are welcome because they will help set a predictable timetable for the introduction of new gTLDs.
- Participation – Prospective applicants are an important for making policy for new gTLDs, they have should have some official representation at ICANN.
- Anti-Trademark – trademark interests have been given too much already, should not be allowed to derail the process.
- Anti-Monopoly – vested interests have too much power; ICANN should introduce competition.
- Security – new gTLDs are an opportunity to make the Internet more secure.
- Contention – EOIs will allow contending parties to make arrangements between themselves to prevent auctions.
- “Slot” Trading – ICANN should take care about EOI “slots” becoming a speculative marketplace.
- Mandatory – Several supporters of EOIs believed they should not be mandatory.
- Confidentiality – Several supporters were concerned that too much information was being collected in the EOI; others thought not enough was being asked.
- Price – the proposed filing fee for EOIs was seen by some as appropriately high, others as too expensive.
IV. Minds + Machines Comment Form
Minds + Machines put together an online form that outlined the rather complicated arguments for and against EOIs as a way to encourage comments from those for whom the prospect of writing out an extended argument might be daunting. We further encouraged commenters both for and against EOIs to use the comment form. Most commenters using this form, but by no means all, sent in comments favorable to EOIs.
V. EOI Opponents
The large majority of commenters opposing the Draft Model represented the concerns of trademark holders: trademark associations or groups (23); trademark attorneys (21); or the legal departments of companies (15) account for more than 80 percent of those in opposition of the Draft Model. A full list of the comments, along with a brief description of each, can be found in the attached PDF.
- Trademark Groups Opposed to EOIs (23)
- Individual Companies Opposed to EOIs (15)
- Individuals Opposed to EOIs (17)
- INTA members (21)
The commenters against EOIs can be further divided into the following categories:
- Large brand owners
- Registrars providing domain name services to brand owners
- Trademark and intellectual property associations
- ICANN’s Intellectual Property Constituency
- Large charitable not-for-profits
- Members of the International Trademark Association (see Section VI below for further explanation).
- Sports organizations
- Independent individuals
- Eric Brunner-Williams
VI. Arguments made against EOIs
The following are the primary concerns found in the comments opposed to EOIs:
- Resolution of overarching issues – The “overarching issues” need to be resolved before any EOIs.
- DAG – The Final DAG needs to be published before an EOI.
- Speculation – EOIs will promote speculative behavior including “slot” trading.
- Time – The process is moving too quickly for proper response and consideration.
- Price – $55,000 is too much for nonprofits, developing countries and for others who cannot afford it.
- No gTLDs – Any new gTLDs are a bad idea.
VII. INTA Submissions
On January 12, INTA, the International Trademark Association (INTA) sent out an anti-EOI message to its membership (full text below), exhorting them to comment, suggesting that merely registering their opinion would be sufficient as a comment. Therefore we have included them as a separate category.
Dear INTA Members,
The following notice is to bring to your attention two Internet domain name
system developments that warrant your consideration and potential action.1. ICANN is Soliciting Input: Should it Proceed with Pre-Registrations for
New gTLDs?The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is seeking
community views, including input from trademark owners and their
representatives, on whether it should begin accepting “pre-registrations” for
new generic Top Level Domains (gTLDs). Please click here for the ICANN
announcement.INTA’s Internet Committee will submit comments opposing pre-registration, but
it is important that ICANN also hear from trademark owners directly.
This letter was followed by comments from INTA members that were brief and did not include a reason for opposing EOIs. A typical example follows:
To: draft-eoi-model@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Pre-registrations for new gTLDs
From: “Lisbet Andersen” lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 10:48:57 +0100As an INTA member I have been encouraged to give my opinion on the pre-registration issue. This is to inform you that I do not support ICANN accepting pre-registrations for new gTLDs.
Kind regards
Lisbet Andersen
VIII. Conclusion
The majority of the comments in favor of the Draft Model supported all of the proposed points in the Draft Model, with some concerns about price and whether EOIs should be mandatory. Strongly, they urged ICANN to move forward expeditiously and to provide a clear and predictable timeline.
The comments against the Draft Model were for the most part opposed to EOIs and new gTLDs in general. The comments from the 21 INTA members were very short comments opposing EOIs. Some of the arguments by large brand holders were longer and did not comment on the staff proposal so much as offer their concerns about EOIs and new gTLDs. The primary concern among companies providing an explanation for their opposition was the resolution of the “overarching issues.” Security was the second greatest concern.
Comments or Corrections
We may well have made an inadvertent error in our analysis. Please send corrections or comments by leaving a comment here or by sending an email to minds@mindsandmachines.com.
